1. Introduction
The perpetrators of farming in rural areas in
general are still faced with the classic problem of the limited availability of
capital, capital constraints may limit the space for agricultural activities in
the rural sector (Hamid, 1986). According Martowijoyo (2005) the weak
performance of financial institutions as financial intermidiasi institutions
can be viewed from three aspects: (1) low levels of loan repayment; (2) low
morality of the implementing agency, and (3) low level of mobilization of
public funds. The weaknesses of keberlansungan life has consequences for
financial institutions that have been established after the program is
completed. As a result, program participants generally will again experience a
shortage of capital.
One of the financial institutions that can be
exploited and encouraged to finance micro segment is a cooperative that
included one of the Formal Financial Institutions (LKF). One of the cooperative
who have been helped are poor is the official cooperation of the Republic of
Indonesia-North Payakumbuh Teachers (KPRI-GPU). The cooperative was founded by
the union of North Payakumbuh teachers based on trust (social capital), and the
presence KPRI-GPU proved to be welfare for teachers in particular and other
small farming communities.
Fukuyama (2002) argues that social capital, focused
on the importance of relationships in economic affairs. Furthermore it is said
that companies, industries, regional, and national economies can function more
efficiently if there is respect for one another (mutually respectful) and the
relationship of trust (trusting relationship) between citizens.
Putnam (1993), also showed evidence that economic
growth is positively correlated with the presence of social capital. Economic
development in a community and economic development of rural (village) would be
good if the following characteristics are owned by economic actors in a synergy
between the activities of the community, namely: (1) The presence of close
relationships in a village with other village between members people, (2) the
presence of leaders who are honest and egalitarian who treat themselves as part
of a community, not as rulers, and (3) the existence of mutual trust and
cooperation among the public.
In his study, Nuwirman (1998) mentions the raising
of capital in the form of principal savings, mandatory, voluntary or sadaqoh
activity group bodies Kongsi and Barn Pitih Nagari (LPN) in West Sumatra.
Other institutions have been successful in
utilizing local institutional as financial intermediaries with rural
communities is a non-bank credit institutions such as LPD in Bali and Lumbung
Pitih Nagari (LPN) in West Sumatra. The purpose of the institution is a
financial intermediary for the rural poor (Robinson, 2001).
KPRI-GPU has been beneficial in increasing its
contribution to the welfare of teachers in Payakumbuh West Sumatra, but is
still small relative to the small farming communities (2%) of total loans.
Based on the above phenomenon can be formulated research problem as follows:
1.
Why
KPRI-GPU can survive and thrive in the long term and play an effective role in
serving the needs of its members in the area Payakumbuh?.
2.
How
KPRI-GPU apply the principle of social capital in enhancing the role of
cooperatives to serve the needs of its members?
3. Review of Literature
3.1 Concept of Financial Institutions
Microfinance Institutions MFIs) is a program of
lending small amounts to the poorest of the poor to finance projects that do
own in order to generate income so as to enable them to care for themselves and
their families, "Programmes extend small loans to very poor for
cell-employment projects that generate income, alowing them to care for Themselves
and their family ". Microfinance Institutions (MFIs) in Indonesia
according to the Asian Development Bank and the World Bank (Gunawan, 2007) The
main characteristic, namely; (1) provides a variety of financial services that
are relevant or appropriate to the real needs of the community, (2) serve
low-income communities and (3) using the procedures and mechanisms are
contextual and flexible to make it more easily accessible to poor people need.
Developing micro enterprises is a strategic move
because it would realize the broad bases development or development through
equity. They need capital to develop its capacity. With business increases
(becomes small scale enterprises), will effectively address the poverty
suffered by themselves and expected to help people in the poor category.
3.2 Definition of Social Capital
Fukuyama (1995) illustrates the social capital in
the trust, believe and vertrauen means that the importance of trust is rooted
in cultural factors, such as ethics and morals. If trust comes up then the
community will share a set of moral values, as a way to create a common hope
and honesty. Fukuyama also stated that, associations and local networks really
have a positive impact on economic welfare and local development and plays an
important role in environmental management. James S, Coleman (1999) asserts
that, social capital as a tool for understanding social action that combines
theoretical perspectives of sociology and economics. This notion was reinforced
by Serageldin (1999) that social capital always involves the community and make
the community arises not only from the interaction of market and economic value.
Simple and general conclusion that can be drawn
about the main elements of social capital include norms, reciprocity, trust,
and network, Fukuyama (1995). The fourth element is a significant influence on
the behavior of co-operation to achieve the desired result, which could
accommodate the interests of individuals and groups who cooperate collectively.
In real terms in everyday life, when examined in depth, all the behavior of
socio-economic activities of local community members embedded in social relationships
network.
Referring to Fukuyana (1995) there are two
parameters ie social capital:
a. Trust :
As explained Fukuyama (1995), trust is a growing expectation in a society
demonstrated their honest behavior, organized and co-operation based on the norms
that are shared. Social trust is an application to this understanding. Damage
social capital will lead to anti-social behavior (Cox, 1995), the absence of
social capital in financial institutions will lead to customer relationship
with the manager of the institution will not trust each other.
b. Norma.
The norms consist of understandings, values, expectations and goals which are
believed and run together of religious, moral guidelines, and standards seem
secular ethical code propfesional. The norms are built and thrive based on the
history of cooperation in the past and applied to support the climate of
cooperation (Putnam, 1993, Fukuyama 1995). The norms can be a precondition nor
a product of social trust.
3.3 Role of Social Capital
Coleman (1988), social capital is inherent in the
structure of relationships between individuals. The structure of social
relations form a network that creates a wide range of social qualities such as
trust, open, unified norms, and define the various types of sanctions for its
members. Putnam (1995) defines social capital as "features of social
organization such as networks, norms, and social trust that Facilitate
coordination and cooperation for mutual benefit".
Sajalan also with what is proposed World Bank
(1999), social capital is defined to the institutional dimension, relationship
created, norms that shape the quality and quantity of social relations in
society. Social capital did not mean only a limited number of institutions and
social groups that support them, but also the adhesive (social glue) that
maintain the unity of the group as a whole.
Lesser (2000), social capital is very important for
the community because it (1) provide ease of access to information for members
of the community; (2) into a media power sharing or division of power in the
community; (3) to develop solidarity; (4) allows the mobilization of community
resources; (5) allows the achievement of joint; and (6) establish and organize
a community kebersamaam behavior. Social capital is a commitment of each
individual to open with each other, mutual trust, authority for any person who
chooses to act according to its responsibilities. This tool generates a sense
of togetherness, solidarity and responsibility at the same time will progress
together.
Specifically World Bank (1998) provided a focus of
attention in the assessment of the role and implementation of social capital
and the possible contribution in the process of poverty reduction, especially
in developing countries. The role and position of social capital in the
community daily activities also have been studied more intensively by experts
from different scientific viewpoints among others, from the perspective of
agro-eco system, economics, sociology, politics, anthropology and psychology.
4. Results Analysis
As a cooperative institution, KPRI-GPU has
demonstrated its role in helping to meet the capital requirements, both
permanent members and associate members to finance farming (2%), for business
or other needs (needs of the household (33%), education (25% ), construction /
trades (34%) and the purchase of vehicles (6%).
The small amount of credit that can be channeled to
the business sector (only 2%) associated with problem assets became collateral.
However, the members KPRI-GPU background as teachers, there is a convenience
for them to get credit facilities because they have collateral SK (decree) as civil
servants. Even to members of non-teachers who obtain credit for farming only 2
percent can also be realized if they could obtain a recommendation from a
teacher who is a permanent member KPRI-GPU.
The portion of lending to the trade sector (12%)
household (42%), education (37%), and for buyers of vehicles (7%). Information
for KPRI-GPU can be seen in Table 1.
Table 1.
Distribution Distribution of Credit by Type of Business In KPRI-GPU. 2015
NO
|
TYPE OF
BUSINESS
|
NUMBER OF
|
OBJECTIVES
|
|
CREDIT (000)
|
(%)
|
|||
1
|
SMALL BUSINESS FARMER
|
12.850
|
2
|
|
2
|
TRADING
|
77.098
|
12
|
|
3
|
HOUSEHOLD
|
269.842
|
42
|
|
4
|
EDUCATION
|
237.718
|
37
|
|
5
|
KENDARAAN
|
44.974
|
7
|
|
TOTAL
|
642.482
|
100
|
From Table 4.1. it can be concluded that the
KPRI-GPU has been instrumental in helping improve the welfare of teachers. It
looks to have 98 percent of the total loans disbursed to improve the welfare of
teachers. Although the portion of credit for farmers occupy the smallest
portion ((2%). These conditions reflect that cooperative efforts is still a
priority to meet the needs and improve the welfare of permanent members
(Employee / Teachers at North Payakumbuh).
a. Establishment of the Institute of Philosophy
KPRI-GPU established on May 2, 1974 (National
Education Day) by PGRI formed Branch Payakumbuh four subsidiaries namely North,
South, East and West Payakumbuh, supported by teachers in the Payakumbuh city
who are determined to improve the economy together. Through a special member
meeting, which was attended by teachers of the national education environment
Payakumbuh decided to form a cooperative and finally succeeded in establishing
KPRI-GPU. Furthermore, a special meeting of members to authorize several
teachers representing teachers throughout the city Payakumbuh to sign the deed
and take care of the legal entity of the government's approval.
On May 2, 1974, BH. No. 976 / BH / XVII-12-12-1974
ended the legal entity is acquired and KPRI-GPPU official operates. The
involvement of members in the establishment of the institution driven by a determination
to change the members of a better standard of living, especially in the
economic recovery.
At the beginning of the founding members is limited
to the national teacher education environment that specifically serves the
needs of teachers Payakumbuh Education Office environment, so that is not a
teacher or a farmer can not access this institution. But in its development of
the board and members agreed to amend the articles of association in 1996 by
decree of the Minister of Cooperatives and SMEs by Decree No. 390 / PAD / KWK.3
/ XII / 1996 dated December 17, 1996 which aims to open up the opportunity for
candidates who are not teachers can a member with extraordinary member status,
so that the cooperative can serve regular members and associate members to earn
credits for both members including to finance the farm.
Credit can be accessed by all permanent members and
associate members. This policy is an opportunity for people who are not able to
access background of teachers to utilize credit for purposes including
financing of farming members.
b. Accessibility
KPRI-GPU is a formal financial institution in the
form of cooperatives, the activity relies on the strength member, so the level
is dependent upon its membership aksessibilites.
KPRI-GPU is built based on the nature of the
family, which in implementing operational procedures and requirements are relatively
easily accessed by members are not covered for the purpose of procuring
housing, including to finance trade and farming.
In KPRI-GPU requirements of
credit applications, (1) is listed as a permanent member as well as exceptional
and is still active, (2) domiciled in Payakumbuh and the District Fifty State,
(3) completing the form, (4) have a mortgage, (SK PNS ) (5) letters of
recommendation from the permanent members and or managers / head unit (in lieu
of collateral), (6) photocopy of ID card / family / SK first and last and
Taspen for members with the status of teachers or employees.
From the aspect of the location, KPRI-GPU is
located in the city Payakumbuh
The process of loan application to be approved and
disbursed loans require relatively quickly (1-2 days) for members who have
become active members.
Their collateral requirements only in the form of a
letter stating that his property would be confiscated if the loan is not repaid
as electronic items, home, land, vehicles, household furniture and so forth.
Loan repayment system on KPRI-GPU
installments over 10 months (10 times) and bear interest at 1 % per month.
In KPRI-GPU so that repayment can
run smoothly every month, the board set a rule that (1) loans disbursed every
6th after the 5th of every month requirement has been met (2) delay in
depositing of the 5th of the month subject to a fine of 0.5 percent per day of
the deposit amount (3), for members in arrears subject to suspension for
subsequent loans for two (2) times the period of arrears and a large loan
maximum is equal to the loan amount of time, (3) the head unit (the principal)
liable (jointly and severally) to repayments members.
Based on the foregoing, the position of credit
loans given to customers farmer has a condition that is quite varied as shown
in Table 4.2.
Table 4.2. Credit Position By Category and Number
Debetur KPRI-GPU 2015
Category
|
Number of Debtor
|
Total Credit (000)
|
NPL (%)
|
Current
|
13
|
452.029
|
99.50
|
Bad Debt
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Bad Debt
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Not Perform
|
1
|
32.124
|
0,05
|
Total
|
14
|
484.53
|
100%
|
Source:
KPRI-GPU 2015.
|
Their administrative procedures
are simple, the requirement of collateral is not absolute, rapid time loan
disbursement, the location is relatively close, and the interest is not very
high (12%)) on KPRI-GPU, an attraction for members including those in the
agricultural sector to access credit. Conditions such as these that cause
KPRI-GPU thrive with assets in 2015 reached 44 billion more, although the
agricultural sector is still found bad credit customers one of 14 borrowers
(0.05%) with the amount of arrears amounting to Rp 32.124 million, -, Arrears
member of a dependent member of endorsement (jointly and severally).
Based on the above circumstances
so on KPRI-GPU is a cooperative of teachers / employees of the cooperative
effort is to the field of household, construction and education.
a)
Justice
of Distribution
KPRI-GPU more lending earmarked for capital
purposes farming (2%), trade (12%), followed by household (42%) education
(37%), for vehicle buyers (7%), (see table 4.1.). The low share of loans
agricultural shows still low chance of farmers to use loans from KPRI-GPU
compared to the teachers / civil servants.
b) credit Worthiness
KPRI-GPU circumstances as described above, has not
been found or has been accessible to small farmers as
the main services of this institute were civil
servants, while for small farmers only about 2 percent of the
total loans disbursed, it was borrowing the teacher
as a credit guarantee for loan installment repayments in
accordance with the rules KPRI-GPU.
c)
The role
of the Board in the Capital Mobilization
KPRI-GPU boards and regulatory
bodies have the Annual Meeting of Members (RAT) in accordance with the articles
of association of cooperatives. Each member has one vote on membership.
Furthermore, every election and dismissal of the board and supervisory bodies
through the annual members' meeting (RAT). RAT can be carried out if attended
by at least 2/3 of the total members.
Board of KPRI-GPU consists of a chairman, secretary
and treasurer. While the regulatory body consists of a chairman and two
members. All officers and employees of the institutions selected through a
selection of special and high school education background above. Meanwhile, to
support the work, managers and employees are specifically given some management
training.
KPRI-GPU, capital mobilization depends on the role
of the board and members.
The formation of the authorized capital as the main
support comes from the activity of participation of members, both in the form
of savings, compulsory savings, as well as special savings. Principal only paid
once when become a member, while the deposit must be paid every month.
Moreover, if the member has excess income, it is recommended to store it in the
form of special savings. Decisions about the form and amount of savings set out
jointly by the RAT, the shape and size of the deposits can be seen in Table
4.3. following:
Table 4.3. Funding in the Capital Mobilization
Collective on KPRI-GPU Year 2012
No
|
Source of funds
|
Years 2012
|
||
Amount (Rp 000)
|
%
|
|||
1
|
Mandatory Deposits
|
11.973.981.458
|
45,97
|
|
2
|
Principal Deposits
|
36.900.000
|
0,15
|
|
3
|
Special Savings
|
9.451.290.915
|
36,30
|
|
4
|
Capital Reserve
|
4.578.591.918
|
17,58
|
|
Total
|
26.917.542.427
|
100,00
|
||
The provisions concerning capital
resources in accordance with the provisions of the articles of association.
Cooperative each member charged Rp 15,000 principal savings, mandatory savings
amounting to Rp 75,000 is paid every month, a special mandatory savings of Rp
414,000, Rp 150,000 administrative costs and fund life risk Rp.21.000 1 year and
for the next year paid by the cooperative. Besides, the board received funds
participation in the form of donations from both government and private
community. Then to add capital, KPRI-GPU board for the creation of a capital
reserve of 25 per cent is deducted from net income (SHU) each year.
In Table 4.3 shows that the
largest contribution to the formation of cooperative collective capital is
derived from compulsory savings (45.97%), principal (0.15%) and specialty
stores (36.30%) and capital reserves (17.58). The amount of the financial
contribution of members in the gathering of collective capital (82.42%)
indicated that the participation of members as evidence of confidence in the
board members is quite high in collective capital formation.
It can be concluded that the
dominant role of the board relative to the mortgage-GPU in capital
mobilization, especially in the mobilization of internal capital that comes
from members' savings.
Conclusion.
Mutual trust between the manager
and members by making mutually beneficial working system between managers and
members. Mutual benefit will arise if the results of the activities carried out
benefit the two sides. This situation will lead to mutual trust, sympathy,
mutual participation and sense of belonging to the institution. This was
evident at KPRI-GPU from formal financial institutions group effectively serve
the needs of capital are poor.
From the aspect of the rules / policy of the
government, the analysis upfront showed that KPRI-GPU menrupakan formal
financial institutions, but in the process of institutional management
incorporates elements of social capital such as trust, participation of
members, and adherence member to the rules / norms fixed by the members
themselves , Thereby increasing the confidence of researchers that, nor is it
necessarily true that government regulation will mengahambat development of institutions.
But in KPRI-GPU, because this center was built (initiate) and built by the
local government so that the initial capital and operational management of the
institution is the duty of the local government, so that the impact on the
progress and independence of the institution in serving the needs of capital
member was not optimal and will ultimately result in lack beneficial to
community development financial institutions weak economy.
References
Coleman,
J. 1988. Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology 94: S05-S120.
Fukuyama, F. 1995. Trust: The
Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. New York: Free Press.
_____________,
2003. Social Capital and Civil Socciety. International Monetary Fund, Working Paper, WP / 00/74 1-8 In Elinor
Ostrom an T.K. Ahn. 2003 Foundation of Socil Capital. Massachusetts: Edward
Elgar Publising Limited
Hamid E.S..1986, Records of the Seminar. In the Rural Credit in Indonesia. Mubyarto
and Edy Suandi Hamid (Eds) .Yogyakarta: BPFE.
Lesser, E., 2000, Knowledge and
Social Capital: Foundation and Application, Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann,
Martowijoyo, S., 2005. The Future of Microfinance Institutions in
Indonesia: Overview of Aspects of Regulation and Control. Padang:
Nuwirman, 1998, Role
of Local Organizations In Survival Defend the Poor Rural Economy. Thesis On
Graduate University of Andalas.
Putnam, et.al., 1993, Making
Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton
Robinson, M.S., 2001 The Microfinance for the Poor, Revolution: Sustainable Finance for the Poor,
Washington, D.C. .: The World Bank.
World Bank, 2003. Social Capital.
Download of http://www.world bank.org/proverty/scapital.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar